PDA

View Full Version : Slim Devices' New Transporter


jtfields
07-25-2006, 07:44 AM
As some of you may know, I'm a big fan of fan of Slim Devices and their Squeezebox (and former SLIMP3 product as well.) For years now all the audiophiles in their development community (their software is open source with an almost "cult" following) have been clamoring for an audiophile grade device that is rack mountable. Well it looks like Slim Devices has finally delivered. They announced their new Transporter last night:

http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_transporter.html

It looks to be basically a component sized Squeezebox on steroids with two displays. The $2,000 price tag definitely prices it out of most people's budget. The operation is going to be essentially the same as the Squeezebox but I guess it should sound much better.

Me personally, I love the look and the functionality. I've always wanted a device like the Squeezebox that was component sized with controls actually on the unit (it never ocurred to me to have two displays but that's definitely cool.) Not being an audiophile I don't need all the high dollar internals though (I'm plenty happy with the Burr-Brown DAC in the current Squeezebox.) I sure hope one day they develop a version of the Transporter with more modest internals and, more importantly, a more modest price.

From a functionality standpoint this is just what I've always wanted. I don't even know what having a "fully balanced analog stage" means much less want to pay $2,000 for. Clearly I'm not the target audience for this device but I'm hoping for a $500 version somewhere in the future. I'd be all over that thing.

Ioman
07-25-2006, 08:06 AM
This looks super sweet. I am trying to get one here for us to review. I love the look of it. The remote control looks like it can use some work though, very bland looking IMO.

jtfields
07-25-2006, 03:34 PM
This looks super sweet. I am trying to get one here for us to review. I love the look of it. The remote control looks like it can use some work though, very bland looking IMO.

Yeah, the remote isn't a work of art but at least it's backlit which is unusual for a piece of audio equipment. I do think in a lot of ways they were trying to take a minimalist approach for much of the design as that's the way a lot of the true audiophiles (the ones willing to shell out a couple of grand for this thing) want their equipment.

jtfields
07-27-2006, 12:34 PM
If you scroll down this page you can download some much bigger pics:

http://www.slimdevices.com/au_press.html

I do love the idea of having controls on the unit. That's one of my biggest complaints about the Squeezebox is that you either have to use the remote or a computer to do anything. Some of the buttons could be better shaped or arranged on the new transporter though, particularly the Play, Rew and Fwd buttons.

Ioman
07-27-2006, 07:03 PM
So does that mean you are going to buy one and let us know what you think!? :)

jtfields
07-27-2006, 09:27 PM
Hmm... What do I love more...my wife or the Transporter? Because basically that's what I'd be chosing between. She'd kill me. :)

It's close but I guess I'll go with the wife. ;)