Ioman
12-26-2006, 11:52 AM
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/25/technology/25flat.html?ref=technology
But the company believes that plasma technology is under unfair attack from competitors making “desperate attempts” to denigrate what it sees as plasma’s superiority, according to Bob Greenberg, Panasonic’s vice president for brand marketing.
To demonstrate plasma is better, the company has offered picture comparisons for journalists at electronics shows. And it has developed marketing materials that dispel some of the myths of plasma’s limitations, like how often to refill the plasma gas (never) and the problems with picture burn-in (none anymore).
I have been preaching forever that Plasma is better than LCD. It's life-span is long, prices are more affordable, and the pictures look more natural. LCD's tend to show a picture that's too sharp and vibrant, it's unrealistic.
I was at Best Buy once when a salesman told me to buy the extended warranty, that they would refill the gas when we needed too. I almost ripped his head off for lying!
But the company believes that plasma technology is under unfair attack from competitors making “desperate attempts” to denigrate what it sees as plasma’s superiority, according to Bob Greenberg, Panasonic’s vice president for brand marketing.
To demonstrate plasma is better, the company has offered picture comparisons for journalists at electronics shows. And it has developed marketing materials that dispel some of the myths of plasma’s limitations, like how often to refill the plasma gas (never) and the problems with picture burn-in (none anymore).
I have been preaching forever that Plasma is better than LCD. It's life-span is long, prices are more affordable, and the pictures look more natural. LCD's tend to show a picture that's too sharp and vibrant, it's unrealistic.
I was at Best Buy once when a salesman told me to buy the extended warranty, that they would refill the gas when we needed too. I almost ripped his head off for lying!