PDA

View Full Version : Metallica's fight against Napster


rfgds
08-29-2002, 07:23 AM
I don't want to hear about their talent and how some of you think they jumped ship... comment about their stand on Napster... after seeing this:

Jason Newsted (former Metallica bassist) on Metallica's fight against Napster:


Quote

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I don't mind sharing my music. I gave
away the first 2,000 Echobrain CDs. But with Metallica, that was their
art. Would anybody, a painter, a photographer, would they give you a
painting free and let you copy it and sell the lithographs for $2,000
apiece?'

"We were in a position, unlike almost every other contemporary artist,
where we had an exclusive contract since 1990. We didn't need to use
the record company as a bank and Metallica has funded everything it's
done, every album, every video. That's why we were so vigilant. No one
else has their own music to protect.

"Most kids are just stealing from a record company, which gets 85%
of the dollar. Not many people make money on music to the point where
you can eat. Not even the people you see on MTV who look like they
are doing so well

"You may think we have too much money for your taste, but we worked
really hard to get to where we are, harder than 97 percent of the
bands that ever existed," Newsted said. "Do you think it's special
enough to pay for? Then it's only fair to pay for it."

Source: AllMetallica.com / Blabbermouth

llbbl
08-29-2002, 07:00 PM
Excuse my language but Jason Newsted is a ****ing moron when it comes to making a statement about sharing services and how they affect the <i> new economy </i>. This is old news anyhow. Back when Napster was originally canned. Not that it isn't good to bring up old topics.

What he said isn't right! People on MTV make alot more money than I do. The few select CEO's who are trying to protect their industry through the RIAA certainly make alot more money than 99.9% of the World population.

It's called capitalism and I don't think its the answer, but then what do I know :P

dang
08-29-2002, 07:43 PM
Watch me cry a river. Yes, Metallica worked hard to get where they are at..and they are receiving royalities because of it.

They are set for life unless they spend their money unwisely.

Plus, they actually ENJOY (I would hope) what they do, unlike 90% of the rest of the population of the world.

ruri
08-30-2002, 09:31 PM
What most musisians evidently don't understand is that the RIAA is screwing both the end-user with their antics as well as the musicians themselves. Just ask Courtney Love.

The RIAA is, essentially, a cartel. Their loyalty (and budget) rest directly on the entertainment conglomerates (Universal, Sony, BMG, Disney, etc...) that made them. They have as much respect for musicians as they do the consumers, which is to say none at all. Just wish Metallica understand that.

Just my 2 pennies.

llbbl
08-31-2002, 11:38 AM
Originally posted by ruri
What most musisians evidently don't understand is that the RIAA is screwing both the end-user with their antics as well as the musicians themselves. Just ask Courtney Love.

The RIAA is, essentially, a cartel. Their loyalty (and budget) rest directly on the entertainment conglomerates (Universal, Sony, BMG, Disney, etc...) that made them. They have as much respect for musicians as they do the consumers, which is to say none at all. Just wish Metallica understand that.

Just my 2 pennies.

I agree ruri. Visit my thread (http://forums.designtechnica.com/showthread.php?s=&postid=915#post915) to learn how you can do your part to destroy the RIAA.