Should we do processor and motherboard reviews?

[Ioman]

Should we do processor and motherboard reviews?

What do you guys think?

[ECA]

lets see:
1000 new mobos every year.
only 3 real good makers, but they still make alot of boards.
3000 other net sites do this also, and STILL none of them are right or give the info I want.
Only if we can get them for free, and keep them after.

As for processors,
NOT. Only thing you really need, is to know the generation of the chipset, and why one set is better then the others. After that you are set.

[Cogar]

An unbiased review of motherboards that are receiving a lot of attention would be good. The more sophisticated computer hobbyists--at least those who build their own computers--believe the big hardware review sites less all the time. For example, Tom's Hardware just tested 24 motherboards, and gave an MSI board (the MS-6728) a "Best of Tom's 2003" award while essentially stating the Abit IC7-G and ASUS P4C800 and P4P800 were run-of-the mill products. I doubt that anyone believes this. (No offense intended to those who own MSI boards.)

[ECA]

ASUS took a back door.....LMAO...

[Archon]

you actually pay attention to that Tom site? lol.

[RageSlave]

you'd better if you ever wish to see any! HEHE.