questionlp
08-07-2003, 10:12 AM
It looks like IBM has spent it's time since SCO's multiple assaults at IBM and Linux quite well and has filed a sizeable counterclaim against SCO.
Per the News.com.com article:
In a 45-page document that it filed late Wednesday, IBM argues that because SCO distributed a version of Linux under the open-source General Public License (GPL), it can't claim that Linux software is proprietary. IBM also argues that SCO software violates four IBM patents and that the company interfered with IBM's business by saying it had terminated IBM's right to ship a Unix product, AIX.
[Source: http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5060965.html]
Slashdot has a dicussion and some additional comments and links regarding SCO's "Linux License". The thread can be found at:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/07/159200&mode=thread&tid=123&tid=136&tid=187&tid=88&tid=99
Bundle this with RedHat's suit filed against SCO (http://news.com.com/2100-7252_3-5059547.html), it looks like things are beginning to get even more exciting :)
Per the News.com.com article:
In a 45-page document that it filed late Wednesday, IBM argues that because SCO distributed a version of Linux under the open-source General Public License (GPL), it can't claim that Linux software is proprietary. IBM also argues that SCO software violates four IBM patents and that the company interfered with IBM's business by saying it had terminated IBM's right to ship a Unix product, AIX.
[Source: http://news.com.com/2100-1016_3-5060965.html]
Slashdot has a dicussion and some additional comments and links regarding SCO's "Linux License". The thread can be found at:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/07/159200&mode=thread&tid=123&tid=136&tid=187&tid=88&tid=99
Bundle this with RedHat's suit filed against SCO (http://news.com.com/2100-7252_3-5059547.html), it looks like things are beginning to get even more exciting :)