PDA

View Full Version : Microsoft loses $521 million in lawsuit


dang
08-12-2003, 08:27 AM
Over at Yahoo (http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/030811/tech_microsoft_patent_5.html), looks like MS lost $521 in a lawsuit on patent infringement.

The story:

SEATTLE (Reuters) - A federal jury in Chicago awarded the University of California and a browser technology company $520.6 million after finding on Monday that their patents were infringed by Microsoft Corp. .

The suit, originally brought against the world's largest software maker in 1999 by Eolas Technologies Inc., charged that Microsoft had used Eolas' patented Web browser technology which allows other mini-applications to work with Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser, according to court documents.

Eolas had argued that the technology for "plug-ins" and "applets" made it possible for Microsoft to compete against the Netscape Navigator browser.

Netscape, which eventually became part of AOL Time Warner Inc., later lost its position as the top Web browser to Microsoft's Internet Explorer.

Eolas, a closely held Illinois company founded by former University of California professor Michael Doyle, had originally sought licensing fees that would potentially have totaled $1.2 billion.

Martin Lueck, who heads the business litigation group at Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP that represented Eolas and the University of California, said the verdict was "very fair and reasonable."

"We think the verdict is vindication that Microsoft has made extensive use of Eolas' technology to make its Internet Explorer the best-of-breed browser," Lueck told Reuters.

Microsoft said it would appeal the decision in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

"While today's outcome is disappointing, we do plan to appeal this decision," a Microsoft spokesman said. "We're confident the facts will support our position."

In a statement, Microsoft said, "We believe the evidence will ultimately show that there was no infringement of any kind, and that the accused feature in our browser technology was developed by our own engineers based on preexisting Microsoft technology."

Eolas was launched in 1994 with an exclusive license to market technology that allows users to run programs over the Web, enabling many of the Web's interactive features.

Asked if a settlement between Microsoft and the plaintiffs were still possible, Lueck said, "That's all in Microsoft's court."

The patent in question is U.S. Patent No. 5,838,906, granted in 1998.

techfreak
08-12-2003, 08:34 AM
This is huge even in Microsoft terms. What in the heck was Microsoft thinking? They need to stop stealing other companies ideas and get original.

dang
08-12-2003, 01:55 PM
it is huge. half a billion is like .5% of BG's total worth.

ECA
08-12-2003, 02:49 PM
MS is still in the old world of comp programming ideals.
They still figure if they can change 1% of the code they can steal it, as they did 90% of there OS.
BUT, with a good Lawyer, you can prove anything.
The hard part was integrating the other software into Explorer. And hiding all the code from the other software. But, MS is good at that. It even has Linux Network built into it(XP).

techfreak
08-12-2003, 03:17 PM
Originally posted by dang
it is huge. half a billion is like .5% of BG's total worth.

haha funny Dang

llbbl
08-28-2003, 08:07 PM
Good cause they got too much money as it is.

ECA
08-28-2003, 08:30 PM
I have 1 concern.
IF the state sued them dont the taxes go down?
WHY NOT?
WHOSE GOT THE MONEY?

dang
08-29-2003, 01:30 AM
The lawyers. :(

ECA
08-29-2003, 07:43 AM
The State, has LAWYERS????

arjay
10-26-2003, 08:09 AM
Honestly tho, all this cheering at M$ loss. Where would we be without M$? Running Macs. Woo Woo.

And the alternative to M$? Linux, which appears to be just as stolen as M$ XP.

Personally, I like XP. I like having a computer that(most times) is easier to operate then my coffee maker. I like my xbox. So who cares that its the dominate (ok really the ONLY) player in the computer OS market. As much as I love Linux, M$ is better, faster, smarter and a whole bucketload easier to run. I mean really, if it wasn't for Microsoft would we have as easy access to the net? or to MP3s? or anything computer related? prolly not. The world as a whole owes a lot to M$ and I for one am grateful.

arjay
10-26-2003, 08:12 AM
Sorry for the bumb

And before anyone says Mac was taking us there.

Sure they were, if you could afford the 4 grand to buy one. Then the really overpriced software.

No Mac wasn't taking us there. Maybe it would of had it had the chance, but not as we know it now for sure.

animekenji
11-15-2003, 12:40 AM
Unfortunately this is bad news not only for Microsoft, but everyone who has a presence on the web as well. It seems that huge swaths of the code that makes the Internet possible are covered under the patent. A future revision of IE will be made to bring Microsoft into compliance with the ruling but that also renders the coding of many websites that call on the infringing code to perform a function worthless because those functions will no longer be accessible. I can hear the collective groaning of the worlds webmasters in unison as they all scurry to remove the offending calls from their web pages and replace them with ones look for the new IE code.