PDA

View Full Version : Gateway DC-M42 Digital Camera


Ioman
11-11-2003, 07:38 AM
Product Descirption:

"The four-megapixel Gateway DC-M42 provides exceptional image quality at just $249.99. The high-performance camera produces stunning film- quality prints and large images up to 11 by 14 inches. Robust and feature- rich, it's perfect for photographers who want advanced technology combined with outstanding value."

ECA
11-11-2003, 10:12 AM
http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/digitalA310Overview.jsp?item=I616755&dbid=616755&urltype=overview

http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/images/A310_l.jpg


There are 2 others cheaper, but they ALL have auto focus.

2,816 x 2,120 (6.0 million), 2048 x 1536 (3.0 million), 1600 x 1200 (2.0 million), 1280 x 960 (1.0 million) pixels

xD-Picture Card (16MB to 512MB)

Normal: 2.0ft to infinity, Macro: 0.3ft. - 2.6ft.

F2.8/F4.8 (W) F7.0/F11.6 (T)

Auto: equivalent to ISO 160-400 with flash off and 200-400-800 with flash on

SPECS, here..
http://www.fujifilm.com/JSP/fuji/epartners/digitalA310Specs.jsp?dbid=616755&item=I616755&subitem=SIDataSpecSheets616755&urltype=dataspec&NavBarId=SIDataSpecSheets616755

freddykruger
02-27-2005, 10:05 PM
The four-megapixel Gateway DC-M42 provides exceptional image quality at just $249.99. The high-performance camera produces stunning film- quality prints and large images up to 11 by 14 inches. Robust and feature- rich, it's perfect for photographers who want advanced technology combined with outstanding value.


Who paid this site to post this review? This camera is a total piece of junk and waste of money. the picture quality absolutely stinks. Read ANY other review to find out some truth. The "4 megapixel" "Fine" quality images aren't even worth printing at 4x6 size. Look elsewhere, NOW!

this "Ioman" character is clearly a "representative" of the site and NOT an unbiased individual.

VeX
02-28-2005, 12:30 AM
Do you actually see how old this thread is??? I'm sure that for todays standard this camera isn't so good, but in 2003 it certanly was.

Ioman
02-28-2005, 09:31 AM
Who paid this site to post this review? This camera is a total piece of junk and waste of money. the picture quality absolutely stinks. Read ANY other review to find out some truth. The "4 megapixel" "Fine" quality images aren't even worth printing at 4x6 size. Look elsewhere, NOW!

this "Ioman" character is clearly a "representative" of the site and NOT an unbiased individual.

lol I have to laugh at your comments. Where did you see a review on Designtechnica? Because all I see is a product description and a picture.

llbbl
03-03-2005, 05:33 AM
i moved the thread

llbbl
03-03-2005, 05:34 AM
I like my Elixm

spankers
03-07-2005, 11:11 AM
I want my MTV.

dang
03-07-2005, 03:19 PM
LOL, we didnt review it.. by putting quotes around it I assumed he pulled a quote from somewhere. I'm betting Ioman posted it when we got the press release and just quoted it. :)