View Full Version : Rachael Baby Scam
Ioman
10-19-2004, 08:10 AM
I had a site reader e-mail me this morning asking if this is a scam. What do you guys think?
Of course it is.
senoryoshio
10-19-2004, 09:06 AM
Has there ever been an 'email tracking' thing ever worked? Plus, a quick Google Image Search turned up that picture in several locations.....People like babies, myself included, but how does a company track email forwards.
Ioman
10-19-2004, 09:08 AM
They can't. There is no way to do it. Its funny how people fall for these things.
llbbl
10-19-2004, 09:17 AM
No company anywhere has agreed to funding something based on how many people you can spam the letter too.
llbbl
10-19-2004, 09:17 AM
Well a reputable company at least...
llbbl
10-19-2004, 09:18 AM
Has there ever been an 'email tracking' thing ever worked? Plus, a quick Google Image Search turned up that picture in several locations.....People like babies, myself included, but how does a company track email forwards.
If the image is hosted remotely they could trak how many people connect to their machine to download the image via your IP address.
senoryoshio
10-19-2004, 09:32 AM
If the image is hosted remotely they could trak how many people connect to their machine to download the image via your IP address.
If they did it that way, and I know you're not saying they are, the company sponsoring the deal would be scammed quite easily.
Archon
10-19-2004, 12:45 PM
never even bother with that stuff, seriously now
the message expressly says emails are tracked. there is no way to do this. this comes from the oldes spammail forward email, where they said bill gates was testing out a new email program, and for participating you would get $1000 or something like that. So ridiculous.
If you look into the Scource info, if its forwarded, it contains ALL the info, to each person...
this can be taken out and used for adverts....Its a scam...
X-Apparently-To: edwardcharlesash@yahoo.com via 206.190.38.206; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:12:59 -0700
X-YahooFilteredBulk: 207.159.120.59
X-Originating-IP: [207.159.120.59]
Return-Path: <twestom@excite.com>
Received: from 207.159.120.59 (EHLO excite.com) (207.159.120.59) by mta314.mail.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:12:39 -0700
Received: by xprdmailfe8.nwk.excite.com (Postfix, from userid 110) id 7CEA03E00; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:12:35 -0400 (EDT)
To: PACALI@aol.com, Send an Instant Message kcc_hnr2001@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message hjeanp1@yahoo.com, vic6935@hotmail.com, edwardcharlesash@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message agirl_n4boyz@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message drpierce3102@yahoo.com, michin68@hotmail.com, drservice@comcast.net, dvsjetta457@aol.com
Subject: FW: MountainWings:Wednesday - A Daughter's Letter
Received: from [67.42.147.105] by xprdmailfe8.nwk.excite.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:12:35 EST
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: ID = 42e18177f0a6a9363eac4a9c73fbc585
Reply-to: twestom@excite.com
From: "Trina" <twestom@excite.com> Add to Address BookAdd to Address Book
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: twestom@excite.com
X-Mailer: PHP
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="EXCITEBOUNDARY_000__a73287d80b56aba8494edf7c5efc56 b8";
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20041001091235.7CEA03E00@xprdmailfe8.nwk.excite.co m>
STARTED HERE.
<20041001091235.7CEA03E00@xprdmailfe8.nwk.excite.co m>
SENt to her..
X-Sender: estom@excite.com
Forwarded HERE:
To: PACALI@aol.com, Send an Instant Message kcc_hnr2001@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message hjeanp1@yahoo.com, vic6935@hotmail.com, edwardcharlesash@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message agirl_n4boyz@yahoo.com, Send an Instant Message drpierce3102@yahoo.com, michin68@hotmail.com, drservice@comcast.net, dvsjetta457@aol.com
I have seen this reach PAGES...
List the header info on that...take a look.
llbbl
10-20-2004, 06:42 AM
Hey ECA u might not want to post all those email addresses to this thread you know.
Also just because all that info of where the email has been is in the header of each email, doesn't mean that its accurate since header info can easily be changed and emails can be spoofed, IP addresses don't always point to the right person and people have more than one email address.
If they want to keep track of who its sent to, can you imagine the thousands to hundred of thousands of copies of the same email that have different header info and the programming task requried to corroberate all this info into one consise list? Also in order for all the data to be "gathered" if you will, people would have to send copies of that email out to the company of where it supposedly originated from.
Now how probable is that?
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.